|
Going Plutonic
I
love SF, which is a good thing, since I work in high tech
(the science part) and my salary is fiction.
But for us SF fans,
nothing is as weird as the downgrading of Pluto.
Poor Pluto was
discovered in 1930 by 24-year-old
American astronomer at Lowell Observatory in Arizona, Clyde Tombaugh.
The Naming Game soon started. It was
11-year-old Venetia Burney, from Oxford, England, who
suggested the name.
It was chosen from a
long list that included Atlas, Apollo, Zeus, Minerva and even
Bacchus.
Needless to say,
reporters of the New York Times pitched Bacchus, the Roman god of wine and
intoxication.
I blame the International
Astronomical Union, which had nothing better to do than
to shake up our solar system.
They redefined
“planet” as:
"a celestial body that is in orbit around
the sun, has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid
body forces so that it assumes a nearly round shape, and has cleared
the neighborhood around its orbit".
It seems that poor
Pluto wobbles a bit and was therefore stripped of its planet status
and demoted to a wannebee or “dwarf” planet. I haven’t got a clue
what that means – can Pluto grow up and become a proper planet?
I am also not sure
what will happen to Pluto’s moon Charon. Will it become Ice
Cube?
So our Pluto is out
of the cosmic planet club, and globetrotting Luciano Pavarotti is in.
Good thing his family
name starts with a P as well – makes us all less p-d off.
After 76 years, Pluto
stepped down as a planet. Let’s hope that British Bess gets the hint and does the
same for her son Charles.
Needless
to say, people (I am referring to Terrans, no clue how the Martians
are taking it. If
the movie “Mars Attacks!” is anything to go by,
not kindly, methinks) are not happy.
The stripping of
Pluto of its planet status also launched a merchandise wave that
would do credit to any presidential campaign.
Scores of Web-savvy
entrepreneurs went on the Internet, selling Pluto memorabilia from
T-shirts and mugs to bumper stickers and mouse pads.
Within 24 hours of
the “bad” news, a wave of Pluto items appeared on Cafepress.com, (a San Francisco-area Internet company
that prints T-shirts and other merchandise), including 200
designs on more than 1,500 products.
Many
items and slogans related to Pluto's demotion and advocated its
return to planetdom, with T-shirts proclaiming "Save Pluto"
and "Stop Planetary Discrimination."
What the eggheads of
the IAU didn’t understand, is that we ordinary people were quite
happy with the nine planets we knew. Let’s face it – does the
downgrade bring us any benefits? Tax cuts, world peace, cure for
AIDS? I don’t think so!
Au
contraire, we now have to memorize one planet less and a few
candidate planets more (including one called Xena, that unfortunately doesn’t have
anything to do with the Warrior Princess)
To quote Dr. Hiroshi
Kyosuke of the University of Tokyo:
"It seems
counterintuitive to me that we should say Pluto is no longer a
planet, yet Donald Rumsfeld is still Secretary of
Defense. After all, Pluto has done no harm."
Hear, hear!
Pluto the dog,
who made his debut in 1930, couldn’t agree more. According to Disney
insiders, he worries about the fate of this namesake and all the textbooks that must be
rewritten.
Personally, I think
that we can do a better job of classifying and naming planets than
those spaced-out cosmos cowboys.
Mercury – Mini-me, since it’s small and fairly close
to Earth.
Venus – Viagra, and let the pharmaceutical industry
sponsor this hard rock.
Earth – Ego, since that’s
what we have, mucho.
Mars – Mars, too many Mars movies have been made and we don’t
want to upset our green neighbors.
Jupiter - Juniper, since this berry gave us far more
pleasure in the form of gin than this huge planet ever
did. Saturnus – Ringtone, if you wonder why, just have a
look at its shape – Nokia can be a sponsor (“connecting
aliens”).
Uranus – U2, for the
mispronunciation by English speaking pubertal adolescents alone.
Great sponsoring opportunity for Bono as well.
Neptune – Loonytune, since only a
loony could have named a gasball after the god of oceans and seas.
Pluto – Exepluto, since it’s exit
for the poor thing and it sounds like a really cool computer program
(that is, as long as it’s not a Microsoft product).
For know, Pluto did
one thing, that many of its fellow planets were not able to do – to
get as more coverage than the Klingon planets!
Back to top
©2006
Debra Daumier
**********************************************************************************************
The Anti-Semitic Passion of
Gibson
August 2006,
Mel Gibson was arrested in the early hours
for speeding along the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu, the famous beach town North of Los
Angeles.
Well, happens to
best of us, you might think.
(Although most of
us don’t drive around in a Lexus).
The arresting
officer told the drunken actor that he was supposed to cuff him but
would not, as long as Gibson cooperated. Fair enough, I would think.
But what does our
thespian do?
He informed the
deputy: “I'm not going to get in your car," and promptly
bolted.
Our law enforcement
officer quickly subdued Gibson, cuffed him and put him inside the
patrol car.
Up till now,
nothing special.
Instead of keeping
his mouth shut, Australia’s import starting acting out once he was
inside the police car.
"You mother
f****r. I'm going to f*** you," he informed the astounded
policeman.
After these crude
words, Gibson then launched into a barrage of anti-Semitic
statements:
"F*****g Jews...
The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world."
Gibson then asked the
deputy, "Are you a Jew?"
(The police officer
wisely didn’t respond)
When this Gibson Monologue escalated, the
arresting officer called ahead for a sergeant to meet them as soon
as they would arrive at the station.
Upon arrival, a sergeant began videotaping
Gibson, who noticed the camera and then said,
"What the f*** do you think you're
doing?"
Gibson then noticed
a female sergeant and yelled, "What do you think you're looking
at, sugar tits?"
(If
you are interested, you can download the report from the
entertainment website www.tmz.com)
The next day, after
spending the night in a detox cell and posting a $5,000 bail, Mel G.
apologized o for driving while drunk and for his "belligerent
behavior" towards the deputy sheriffs who arrested him.
Mmmm, doesn’t sound
like a sincere apology to me.
I also miss the
reference to his anti-Semitic remarks.
Not that I am
surprised, mind you.
For
one, Gibson is a staunch Catholic (nothing wrong there), who shares
many beliefs of the Traditionalist Catholic
movement.
This
sect rejects some or all reforms started by the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s.
It’s
quite funny that he became so successful in hedonist Hollywood.
That
must explain the private chapel Mel built.
The Holy Family Catholic Church is run out of
Gibson's Icon Production company offices, with an Icon employee
responsible for keeping the church's books and Gibson and his wife
Robyn
as director.
The Gibsons donate
money (tax free, of course!) of via the AP Reilly Foundation, a charity they
established for the sole purpose of creating the church. Pennywise,
but definitely not Pound-foolish!
Mel’s father, Hutton Gibson, has repeated claimed that
the Holocaust was exaggerated.
According to Gibson
Père, Jews are out to create "one world religion and one world
government" and outlined a conspiracy theory involving Jewish
bankers, the US Federal Reserve and the Vatican, among others.
Oy
vey!
To come back to the
current peccadilloes of M.G., the media (including the New York Times and Fox) jumped on the story, not in the least
due to the current wars raging in the Middle East.
Thanks
to the worldwide web, the story spread like wildfire.
As
the New York Times correctly pointed out, in a
little over 24 hours, Mr. Gibson’s arrest and subsequent behavior in
Malibu had already prompted talk of a claimed cover-up, an exposé,
worldwide news coverage, an apology and then a full-blown push for
alcohol rehabilitation, even as his representatives and executives
at the Walt Disney Company rushed to catch up with
the event’s effect on the filmmaker’s movie and television projects
with the company.
The fallout was
instantly: On Monday, Hope
Hartman, a spokeswoman for Disney’s ABC
television network, said the company was dropping its plans to
produce a Holocaust-themed miniseries in collaboration with Mr.
Gibson.
The reason given:
“it’s been nearly two years and we have yet to see the first
draft of a script, we have decided to no longer pursue this project
with Icon,” according to Ms. Hartman, referring to Mr. Gibson’s
production company.
Gibson’s production
company Icon started developing this four-hour
miniseries for ABC, in what was widely seen as an effort to patch up
his relations with parts of the Jewish community after his “Passion of Christ” movie.
Needless to say, this
is a huge relief.
To quote Rabbi Marvin Hier, head of the Simon
Wiesenthal Center:
“I don’t think he should
be doing a film on the Holocaust. It would be like asking someone
associated with the K.K.K. to do a movie on the
African-American experience.”
There is a famous
Latin expression: "in vino veritas" – therefore, one
remark our Mel (who promptly checked into rehab) made, hits home:
"My life is f****d."
And if you look at
his photo, you see an uncanny resemblance to another notorious
anti-Semite…
Back to top
©2006
Debra Daumier
**********************************************************************************************
The Case of the Cursing
Parrot
We all read stories or watched pirate movies with cursing parrots perched
on the shoulder of a mean, one-legged sailor.
Well, such a bird is
currently making headlines.
The Bird (name
unknown) has the habit of screaming phrases such as “maniac”, “homo”
and “son of a bitch” at regular intervals.
The bird belonged to
an orthodox Jew, who bought it as a pet for
his kids. Needless to say, he was not too happy by the verbal
outbursts of the creature.
I am still puzzled
that he didn’t find that characteristic out before he purchased the
bird, but who am I? Anyway, the pater familias went to the rabbi to
find out how to handle the feathery culprit.
The rabbi informed
him that the parrot should be slaughtered since he “sins and causes
others to sin.”
Personally, I thought
that you only sinned if you purposely commit an act that
is sinful, but obviously, I am wrong (being a woman and not orthodox
probably accounts for that).
The family father is a patient of a holistic
doctor who decided to come to the bird’s rescue. No good deed goes
unpunished, so the good doctor had to fork over $ 3,000 to save it
from death row. The doctor was now stuck with a bird that has quite
a mouth on it.
So how did our medical professional handle the
situation? Yep, you guessed it – he consulted a
rabbi!
The second rabbi recommended that the
poor parrot either be put to death or have his tongue severed, which
brings back images of mediaeval witch trials, doesn’t it?.
The story hid the headlines and all kinds of
organizations and individuals came to the bird’s defense; some of
them even protested in front of the doctor’s
house.
The “Let Animals Live Foundation” took
it a step further and applied to the court to prevent the pending
execution (or tongue mutilation). In its petition, the Foundation
stated that there is a reasonable basis to assume the parrot will be
subjected to suffering and cruelty. Therefore, the court must
interfere with a restraining order. The ruling judge agreed and
issued an injunction protecting the parrot from being harmed in any
way. For now, our feathered friend is safe.
The order will apply
until a further decision is made. In the next few days, a
deliberation will be held and the court will seal the parrot’s fate.
Our good doctor is planning to attend the court session accompanied
by the parrot in question.
Let’s
hope the bird will not engage in foul language in court – that’s the
prerogative of lawyers!
Back to
top
©2006
Debra Daumier
**********************************************************************************************
Vive the Eurovision Song
Contest!
If you want to know what
makes Europe tick, watch the annual Eurovision Song
Contest.
Way before reality
shows, Europe already enjoyed its own version.
Since 1956, it’s one
of the major European events –aimed at bringing different European
cultures together.
Participants use it
as their jumping board to international fame and fortune.
Apart from Abba, no one has been
successful.
To represent a
country, you can be a non-citizen (not unlike major league soccer)
or even (gasp!) American, but the country must be a member of the European
Broadcasting Union.
In short, all
European countries (and Israel) join in the festivities.
In Cold War days,
before the fall of the Iron Curtain, Western European singers would
sing in their native tongue.
Needless to say,
Anglos won a lot more times than singers belting out ballads in
Norwegian, Swedish, Finnish, Dutch, or Hebrew.
A few years ago, they
changed the rules and everybody can sing in English. Hurray!
The fun part is not
the singing, but the voting.
You see, if you want
a crash course in European history, politics, and sensibilities –
The Eurovision is the show to watch!
Germany, for obvious
reasons, would end up with nil points, Portugal would give 12 points
to Spain, and vice versa, the Benelux countries would vote for one
another as would the Scandinavian countries.
Once the Central and
Eastern European countries joined, there was an additional
problem.
Too many countries
(37 in all!) – the live show would take forever!
Since the whole
shindig has to be over in 3 hours, they limited the number of
participating countries to 24.
On Saturday May 20,
the 51st Festival took place.
And what a party it
was, broadcasted on television, radio and Internet.
Greece
was the host this year. You see, once you win the contest, the
country you represent is punished by having to host the next one.
The Greeks were happy though; they could reuse the Olympic
facilities they built for the 2004 games.
The best channel to
watch the event on is the BBC – the presenter Terry Wogan (who is an old hand at it) is
wickedly funny and very non-PC.
One
of his best remarks was “don’t mention the marbles”.
(European
History Lesson #1: The Brits took/stole/moved the Elgin Marbles out of Greece during an
archeological dig at the beginning of the 19th century
and have been refusing to give them back ever since.
Even movie star and
Minister of Culture Melina Mercouri unsuccessfully tried to
convince the lime users that they should be a good sport and return
them pronto).
I will give you my
impressions – feel free to send me your reactions via the contact
form.
(do not send hate
mail; the cat will eat it and throw up).
The concept is
simple: song, commercial about Greece, another song etc. (24x in
total).
The residents of each
country can “televote” for their favorite.
Points are awarded
from 1 to 6 (nobody pays attention to those) and then 8, 10 and 12
points.
Votes are announced
by a local celebrity, who takes the opportunity to promote
him/herself or his/her country, showing off their language
skills.
The winner performs
the winning song again and gets stink drunk.
(European History
Lesson #2).
The
Greek presenters were a young, goodlooking couple bearing an uncanny
resemblance to the main characters of Will &
Grace.
The female half had
the annoying habit of calling everything and everyone “amazing” so I
guess her name is Amazing Maria.
Overall, it seems
that the Greeks told people to wear white or get lost.
More than half of the
outfits were in different shades of white.
Considering that the
settings and lightning were gorgeous, not such a bad concept.
Between the songs
were small commercials of the Greek Tourist Board.
You know what I mean
– blue sea, happy people, food, drink, you name it.
Each commercial
started with a gorgeous girl with long wavy hair and some blue
fabric in the background floating in the wind. It looked so much
like a fabric softener commercial that I promptly remembered to turn
on my washing machine.
One
of the first songs was performed by a Britney
Spears clone from Moldova.
Sparsely clad, she
chanted “moca, rocka, choca” several times. Oh what a
blessing that she could perform in English!
Spain tried to cash in on “the
Ketchup Song” success of 2002.
The four Ketchup sisters were dressed in red (what
else?) and sitting in office chairs. Their song (for reasons unclear
to me) was called Bloody Mary. I don’t know if it related to a) the
drink or b) Queen Mary.
(European History
Lesson #3: King Henry VIII’s daughter was a staunch Catholic who
eliminated subjects with a different faith. Hence her nickname
“Bloody Mary”)
Germany shocked the world with its
version of a country & western song.
The lead songstress
was dressed in a Barbie pink dress with feathers.
She acted like a
five-year old, despite pushing 30.
Well, if the Germans
have country & western, we can bring back the twist.
At least, that is
what the Danes must have
thought.
Five Paris Hilton look-alikes were singing about
the twist while a handsome guy twirled around break dancing. Go
figure.
(no European History
Lesson here!)
Favorite
Russia sent a Ricky Martin/Robbie Williams look-alike.
Dressed
as Marlon Brando in “A street car named
desire”, he performed a song called "never let her go" that sounded
uncannily like a Ricky Martin song. Lawsuit, anyone?
For reasons unclear
to me (State sponsoring may be?), he was surrounded by several
graceful Swan lake ballerinas.
Half a ballerina was
sticking out of a piano, which is a shameful waste of one gorgeous
ballet dancer and one perfectly nice piano.
Macedonia decided to send
a Fran Fine look-alike surrounded by your
average MTV video dancers. Boooooooring!
Lithuania obviously had
some management training or other.
Six business
suits kept repeating: “we are the winners of Eurovision”.
It
sounded like a soccer chant – including megaphone.
The United Kingdom was represented by
what sounded like the cast of “Annie”.
The girls were
dressed in skimpy schoolgirl uniforms –very passé as Tatu and Britney Spears can tell you.
The only
redeeming feature was the excellent violin player in the
background.
Host
country Greece featured
an Anastacia-look alike, nicely dressed in
black pants and a designer variation of the famous peasant
blouse.
She
was one of the few that didn’t come with lots of gimmicks,
background dancers and the like.
For
that alone she should ve come in 2nd. She could
also sing!
The
most surprising entry was victorious Finland.
In
a contest were the majority of the songs are copycats of MTV/VH1 successes (last
year, it was one Latino song after the other), the Finns decided to
go heavy metal.
The
five member band "Lordi" consisted of one
lead singer, two guitarists, one keyboard player (the only chick in
the band) and one drummer, all of them in full costumes and monster
masks.
Think KISS going Klingon and you get the idea. What can I
say?
It
worked for me (being a hard rock and SF fan) and many
voters.
The
best part was when the lead singer unfolded his huge bat wings.
Wow,
Worf would have been so
jealous!
One
of the guitarists also imitated the tongue movements of Gene Simmons, with limited
success.
The
Greeks provided a fitting rock concert background,
including fireworks.
Following the popular
trend, the Ukraine also sent a
Britney/Madonna copy in a tacky outfit.
She was surrounded by
dancing Cossacks (in red this time, and not white).
Ah, La Belle
France….
Being it’s arrogant
self, France stubbornly stuck to its mother tongue thus neatly
ruining its chances.
Keeping in line with
the Dress Code, the chanteuse was dressed in a white Grecian style
frock, belting out a chanson (of course) accompanied by an excellent
cellist. He should hook up with the violinist of the Brits.
The Irish representative also went for a
ballad as well.
The best feature
was the singer's resemblance to Colin Farrell, which was a nice
change from all the Britney/Madonna/Anastacia clones.
Sweden tried to copy its Abba success of decades
ago by sending a clone of the dark-haired female singer. Even her
outfit looked like it came out of the Abba wardrobe – gold overalls
with a blue train that put the one on Princess Diana’s wedding dress
to shame. The poor dear looked like she was performing in a Fellini movie.
Turkey obliviously ran out of the most
popular clone models and settled for a Donatella Versace look-alike.
As least, she had the
guts to sing in Turkish, which earned her 12 points from several
countries (more about that later).
No
contest without an icon, so during the voting break, Amazing Maria
and poster boy schlepped Nana Mouskouri on stage. After telling
everyone that there “are no losers, only winners” she left without
singing.
This
is only fair, considering the quality of the
performances.
After the 24 songs
were performed, it was time to vote for the 37 voting countries.
During this
intermission, the Greeks put up a bewildering show that somehow
should represent Greek history throughout the ages, but consisted
mainly of a colorful chicken dance against opera music.
Once the votes were
in, the real fun started.
You see, it went like
this:
-
The Russian
Block, the Baltic Block and the Balkan States mainly voted for
each other with the top votes (10 and 12) for Russia (you never
know what will happen in the future!) and Finland (you never know
if the Nokians will invade the Baltic).
-
The Nordic
Countries voted for each other (Norway gave 12 points to Denmark;
Iceland the same amount to Finland).
-
Portugal and
Spain must having a tiff – they didn’t award any points to each
other. Mmmm, something rotten in the Iberian Peninsula?
-
Ireland gave 12
point to the UK and vice versa. Surprise, surprise!
-
Malta and Cyprus
gave top honors (and points) to host Greece.
-
Andorra didn’t want
to rock the boat with its powerful neighbor and duly awarded 12
points to Spain. (European History Lesson # 4: don’t mess with
your neighbors if you are a tax haven)
-
The Netherlands and
Germany gave 12 points to Turkey thanks to the millions of Turkish
immigrants in these countries.
-
Russia received 12
points from Israel, where there are 1M. Russian immigrants in a
country with a total population of 6M.
The 37 jury
representatives of the voting countries were a nice sideshow on its
own.
Why not use your five
minutes of fame?
The
Dutch guy, who gave “dressing down” a whole new meaning, was heavily
hitting on the male Greek host.
He
even gave his mobile phone number on air, so I sincerely hope that
the idiot was spammed with obnoxious sms
messages.
Belarus
had a Victoria Beckham
look-alike (with glasses) announcing its results.
One of the countries
that didn’t survive the semi-finals happily announced that it will
be the winner next year. That will speed the 2007 voting up!
But Macedonia stole
the show: The jury guy started serenading Amazing Maria.
(European
History Lesson # 5: Not since since Alexander the Great has a
Macedonian expressed so much goodwill towards
Greece).
So
you see - European history is fun. It also repeats itself every
year, so I will see you in 2007!
Back to top
©2006
Debra Daumier
**********************************************************************************************
How Kaavya Viswanathan got clever, got
caught and lost her reputation
Kaavya
Viswanathan, in case you missed it, is a 19-year old Harvard
University sophomore with an interesting notoriety.
You see, she penned a
chick lit novel "How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a
Life".
At the tender age of
17, she signed a 6-figure deal with her publisher Little, Brown and Co.
So far, so good.
Sales were moderate and our enterprising authoress was happily
studying away at her Ivy League school.
But
then an observant reader (must be one that is an expert in chit lit)
noticed some remarkable similarities with other novels, especially
"Sloppy Firsts" and "Second Helpings" by Megan
McCafferty, a Columbia alum.
After being informed
by email of the striking similarities, McCafferty informed her
publisher Random House.
They promptly sent a
letter to the legal eagles at Little, Brown and Co.
McCafferty gracefully
stated: "After reading the book in question, and finding
passages, characters, and plot points in common, I do hope this can
be resolved in a manner that is fair to all of the parties involved.
I am so grateful for the diligence and support of Random House's
legal counsel."
Wow, that lady has a
damn good PR firm!
It
could have ended there, were it not for the enterprising David Zhou of the Harvard Crimson student newspaper.
He
followed up, did some serious research, and proved beyond a shadow
of a doubt that whole passages of the Opal Mehta story were copied
ad verbatim from other novels that were definitely not protected by
Ms.Viswanathan’s copyright.
The enterprising Mr.
Zhou published on the Crimson website that "Opal Mehta" also contained
passages similar to Meg
Cabot's popular novel, "The Princess Diaries",
published by HarperCollins in
2000.
To give you an idea,
read the following description in Cabot’s novel:
"There isn't a single inch of me that hasn't been
pinched, cut, filed, painted, sloughed, blown dry, or moisturized.
... Because I don't look a thing like Mia Thermopolis. Mia
Thermopolis never had fingernails. Mia Thermopolis never had blond
highlights."
Just compare this
with the description from "Opal Mehta" on page 59:
"Every inch of me had been cut, filed, steamed,
exfoliated, polished, painted, or moisturized. I didn't look a thing
like Opal Mehta. Opal Mehta didn't own five pairs of shoes so
expensive they could have been traded in for a small
sailboat."
The
New York
Times took up the story as well and reported that parts
of Viswanathan's novel had an uncanny resemblance to Sophie Kinsella's "Can You Keep a
Secret?"
Viswanathan is her
defense claimed that the main character of McCafferty’s books, a
smart NJ teen named Jessica Darling,
"inspired" her to
"internalize" prose.
Mmmm, isn’t that an
elegant way of saying "ripping off"?
She appeared on NBC's Today Show informed a skeptical Katie Couric
that the similarities were "unintentional."
"As I was writing, I genuinely believed
that every single word I was writing was my own,” she claimed. “All
I can say is that, while reading Megan McCafferty's books, I just
internalized her words. I never intended to take any of her
words."
Yeah, sure, that will
hold up in court!
Ms. V’s publisher
first contemplated to publish a revised edition of the novel, but
later on decided to scrap it all together.
The lucrative book
deal (half a Million for two books) was cancelled.
I bet the legal/PR
team had a lot to do with that. (Crisis management, anyone?)
Ms. Viswanathan is
smart cookie, so why did she go through all this trouble to rip off
others?
My guess is that the
answer is in the way she marketed her novel.
She hooked up with a
"book packaging company"
called Alloy
Entertainment (formally known as 17th Street
Productions). They share copyright with the enterprising
Viswanathan.
Book
packagers or book producers act as liaisons between publishing
houses and everyone who works to put together a book--authors,
artists, editors, photographers, researchers, indexers, and
sometimes even printers.
Alloy helped
Viswanathan to make her work more commercially viable (read:
commercial) and helped her to “flesh out the concept.” How far did
the co-writing go?
Alloy specializes in
“teen glam” fiction – may be some overeager staffers did a bit of
cut and paste?
Viswanathan’s past
writings are also under scrutiny. The Record of
Bergen County (180,000-circulation daily paper in
northern New Jersey) announced that it will review the news articles
written by Viswanathan during her stint as an intern in 2003 and
2004.
The big winner in
this amazing story is Ms. Megan McCafferty - our main victim.
If copying is the
highest form of flattery, she is on top of the world.
The latest count
totaled more than 40 passages that were lifted from her novels by
Kaavya Viswanathan.
At this moment,
McCafferty has more than 400,000 copies in print (compared to
Viswanathan’s 100,000) and recently launched her third novel
"Charmed Thirds".
Megan declined all
interviews and let publishers and lawyers speak on her behalf.
According to her
publisher: "This has been an enormous distraction for Megan.
It's been a very, very difficult and devastating couple of weeks for
her."
Cheer up dear, it’s
time to laugh all the way to the bank.
Are you curious to
know what Ms. Viswanathan wants to be after graduation from Harvard?
No, not a lawyer, but
close – an investment banker on
Wall Street!
Back to top
©2006
Debra Daumier
**********************************************************************************************
How to settle a family fued
- by becoming infallible
Legislation is a powerful
tool – just check the history of the American Constitution or the British Magna Carta.
But using it to
outsmart your brother is unique – but effective if we look at what
happened in Brunei.
The
Sultan of
Brunei (the monarch of a small but rich country) is
fighting his younger brother Prince Jefri Bolkiah, in court.
The
Sultan accuses his brother of embezzling around $ 12 billion during
his 13 years as finance minister.
In 2000,
the two brothers reached an out-of-court settlement that compelled
Jefri to pay back $ 4.5 billion in assets, including properties in
Paris, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan, Britain and the
US.
It seems
that the London-based Jefri never honored the agreement, while
continuing his $ 400,000 a month lifestyle.
In the
latest court ruling by Chief Justice Mohammad Saied, Prince Jefri
has been ordered to sell his London mansion (St John's Lodge in Regent's Park), the
five-star New York Palace Hotel in Manhattan, the Bel-Air
Hotel in Los Angeles, a property at Place Vendome in Paris, a mansion in
Singapore and an undisclosed quantity of cash and jewels.
To
ensure this, the monarch changed the Brunei constitution and gave
himself the same status as the Pope – he is infallible.
“His
Majesty the Sultan ... can do no wrong in either his personal or any
official capacity.”
As a
result, Prince Jefri has no legal options to appeal the latest
ruling – unless he becomes Sultan.
To
prevent Prince Jefri blabbing to the press, the following was
degreed:
“No
person shall publish or reproduce in Brunei or elsewhere any part of
proceedings ... that may have the effect of lowering or adversely
affecting directly or indirectly the position, dignity, standing,
honor, eminence or sovereignty of His Majesty the
Sultan.”
What an
elegant way to settle a score with an annoying sibling!
Back to top
©2006
Debra Daumier
**********************************************************************************************
De Bello Birkenstocko
War is raging in the Birkenstock family.
So what? you might say. Well, it’s not just a family tiff – big
bucks are involved. You see, the Birkenstock family has been
producing footwear since 1774. Over the last
decades, the current generation of Birkenstocks were able to turn
padded, hippie footwear into a multi-million dollar
business.
As always, it’s a case of cherchez la femme – in
this case Susanne Birkenstock,
who married Christian Birkenstock
at the age of 18 in the late 1990s, produced two children and then
started divorce procedures. Our Susanne is a hard-nosed
businesswoman who spent seven years in the family's garage
developing her own line of orthopedic shoes. (Since the family home
is a castle, we can safely assume that the garage was big enough to
do some serious shoe tinkering.) Since a girl has to make a
living, separated (and heading for divorce) Suzy started producing
her own sandals, promoting them on talk shows. Since she has blond
good looks, more money than the average high-tech startup and a
well-known family name, the talk show circuit just loves her. Her
own Beautystep sandals boast a specially
designed sole “mimicking the effect of a foot stretching out as it
sinks into fine sand.” The sandals are positioned to help the
wearer to burn fat and reduce cellulite.
Needless to say, the
original Birkenstocks (Christian and his two brothers, not the
hippie wear) were breathing fire when they found out. They
screamed that Susanne is using the Birkenstock name to market her
scientifically questionable product. They demanded that she stops
using the family name for any product
endorsement. “Humbug” retorted the enterprising
near-divorcee. “Birkenstock is my legal name and that of my
children. I have been a Birkenstock for half of my
life.” For sure, the name Birkenstock helped to sell the
more than 35,000 pairs of sandals in Germany, Austria and
Switzerland since Beautystep was launched in 2004.
The B.
brothers took aggressive action – they had their marketing executive
sent a letter to all Birkenstock retailers and distributors,
accusing Susanne Birkenstock of profiting from her married
name. They also petitioned a German court to stop her from using
it in marketing.
In February 2005, a court in Cologne ruled
that Susanne Birkenstock could use her name as the designer of her
shoes but imposed restrictions on how prominently it could be
featured in sales materials. Toeing this fine line meant making
some changes in Beautystep’s marketing, such as abandoning a website
for SB International that used her married name and relying only on
the Beautystep site. The Birk brothers were still not
amused. They kept being plagued with inquiries from retailers and
wholesalers about the Beautystep brand. Instead of doing the
sensible thing, buying up Beautystep, milking it for maximum
publicity and increasing sales (as well as the inheritance of
Susanne’s and Christian’s offspring), the brothers decided to make
lawyers happy (brandname infringement) and petiotoned a higher court
to toughen the rules established by the lower court. The
Birkenstockies are mainly ticked off by the fact that Beautystep
keeps being referred to as Birkenstock
by distributors, television stations or journalists.
In my
opinion, the Birkenstocks should have a close look at the business
potential of this smart cookie – with an initial investment in 2003
of Euro 200,000; she was able to break even in 2005. Being one
smart marketer, the Birkenstock group would be wise to appoint her
as its Global Chief Marketing Executive. It would also save them a
bundle in legal fees.
Who would have thought that the main
footwear suppliers of Woodstock, environmenatalists and micro-biotic
lifestyle seekers would be so 1980s business aggressive? O
tempores, o mores......
Back to top
©2006
Debra Daumier
**********************************************************************************************
Roaming "Rome"
The TV drama series “Rome”
has been hailed as amazing.
Well, it
certainly did the trick of amazing me!
You see,
I had the pleasure of 6 years of Latin (2 hours a day) in school and
was always curious how ancient Rome and its inhabitants would have
looked like.
The
HBO series enticed me with a great
“behind the scenes” preview explaining about the sets and costumes.
In good
BBC tradition, they showed how they made copies of artifacts and
outfits, only applying materials and dyes that were in use two
millennia ago. They meticulously built Roman streets,
buildings, temples and the like.
I was
impressed, and looking forwards to the first episode.
I mean,
any channel that produced the critically acclaimed and massively
enjoyed “Claudius” series would do a great job
– so I thought.
The
first episode started with a very graphic and unrealistic sex
scene.
It
seems that if you show an actress in full frontal nudity in a
historical drama, the scene will not be censored.
Probably
to emphasize the historical context – slaves were waving big feather
fans to cool the coupling couple.
The
actress might have been completely nude, but her partner was wearing
some |